 |
|
||
|
#81
30/08/13, 15:23:28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bueno pues sinceramente no veo diferencia de esta a la C-rom
__________________
EXPERIENCIAS ROM'S, GB, ICS Y JB aqui http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?p=5655757
[MOD] Inverted GAPPS ICS - Jelly bean - AOKP - CM10 - CM9 - Helly Bean [por xlory]  
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
|
|
#82
31/08/13, 07:53:57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bueno,no he querido actualizar este hilo hasta ahora,porque esta rom estaba dando pequeños fallos.En este momento ya no da ninguno aparentemente.Suave y fluida,sin ningun problema en la instalacion y con mucha configuracion.A la altura de C-ROM,vamos que son casi identicas.Saludos.
__________________
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
#83
03/09/13, 20:41:21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bien,he actualizado el hilo de esta rom ya que parece que han mejorado bastante los pequeños fallos que tenia y ahora mismo la verdad es que va realmente bien.Aprovecho para poner el Antutu nuevo que esta muy bien.
__________________
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
#84
03/09/13, 22:15:47
|
||||
|
||||
 Cita: Originalmente Escrito por mamoto
Bien,he actualizado el hilo de esta rom ya que parece que han mejorado bastante los pequeños fallos que tenia y ahora mismo la verdad es que va realmente bien.Aprovecho para poner el Antutu nuevo que esta muy bien.
__________________
EXPERIENCIAS ROM'S, GB, ICS Y JB aqui http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?p=5655757
[MOD] Inverted GAPPS ICS - Jelly bean - AOKP - CM10 - CM9 - Helly Bean [por xlory]
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
#86
08/10/13, 15:58:52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por Ckracks
La he pillado para probarla y va fina fina la ultima...mejor que la c-rom aunque parecen que son practicamente iguales
__________________
|
|
#87
08/10/13, 16:14:46
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por mamoto
Cambia que esta lleva Mackay kernel.
__________________
EXPERIENCIAS ROM'S, GB, ICS Y JB aqui http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?p=5655757
[MOD] Inverted GAPPS ICS - Jelly bean - AOKP - CM10 - CM9 - Helly Bean [por xlory]
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
#88
08/10/13, 17:36:10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por slipknot30
Eso le dije a the_wolf quien llava la carbón en XDA y no veas como se puso conmigo el colega
__________________
|
|
#89
08/10/13, 18:45:36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por mamoto
Pero te dijo las diferencias?
,EDITO : Respuesta de sways http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=45138757
__________________
EXPERIENCIAS ROM'S, GB, ICS Y JB aqui http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?p=5655757
[MOD] Inverted GAPPS ICS - Jelly bean - AOKP - CM10 - CM9 - Helly Bean [por xlory]
Última edición por slipknot30 Día 08/10/13 a las 19:00:20.
|
|
#90
08/10/13, 19:03:32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Respuesta de the_wolf http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=45151690
__________________
EXPERIENCIAS ROM'S, GB, ICS Y JB aqui http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?p=5655757
[MOD] Inverted GAPPS ICS - Jelly bean - AOKP - CM10 - CM9 - Helly Bean [por xlory]
|
|
#92
08/10/13, 19:30:59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por Aways
What is problem guy's?
__________________
EXPERIENCIAS ROM'S, GB, ICS Y JB aqui http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?p=5655757
[MOD] Inverted GAPPS ICS - Jelly bean - AOKP - CM10 - CM9 - Helly Bean [por xlory]
|
|
#93
13/10/13, 23:57:37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hola, gracias por seguir manteniendo vivo nuestro galaxy...la he instalado hace un par de dias y va todo muy bien a ecepcion de una cosilla..
La recepcion del wifi..va muy mal..de que forma podria hacerla mas fuerte, es decir tener mejor cobertura wifi..tengo el wifi en casa pero el movi pilla muy mal y a veces ni lo pilla.. Otra cosilla tonta.el icono de tener acitva la red..en otras roms son dos flechas arribabajo..en este solo son las barras de la señal..hay algun mod para poner ese icono? Otra y ultima.hay algun tuto e español que te explique que es cada cosa del menu de Carbon. esta todo en ingles y yo de eso ni papa..algunas s eentiendes por simple logica..pero otras ni de coña.. Gracias y seguir asi.
__________________
Última edición por p4mp3r0 Día 14/10/13 a las 00:00:13.
|
|
#94
14/10/13, 07:10:08
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por p4mp3r0
Hola, gracias por seguir manteniendo vivo nuestro galaxy...la he instalado hace un par de dias y va todo muy bien a ecepcion de una cosilla..
La recepcion del wifi..va muy mal..de que forma podria hacerla mas fuerte, es decir tener mejor cobertura wifi..tengo el wifi en casa pero el movi pilla muy mal y a veces ni lo pilla.. Otra cosilla tonta.el icono de tener acitva la red..en otras roms son dos flechas arribabajo..en este solo son las barras de la señal..hay algun mod para poner ese icono? Otra y ultima.hay algun tuto e español que te explique que es cada cosa del menu de Carbon. esta todo en ingles y yo de eso ni papa..algunas s eentiendes por simple logica..pero otras ni de coña.. Gracias y seguir asi. Mod no se,pero puedes cambiar el Tema y te cambiara cosillas que puede que te gusten mas.Lo del ingles,puedes usar el google traductor y si no pregunta si te puede ayudar alguien.Saludos. Por cierto esta rom mejora dia a dia.
__________________
Última edición por mamoto Día 14/10/13 a las 07:54:29.
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
#95
14/10/13, 14:55:29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let's clarify a few points. Mackay kernel was not chosen on advice, but simply because it seems to give the best performance and is updated more often than Semaphore kernel. Don't consider kernel a FEATURE (as I already stated), because IT'S NOT and you can flash the kernel you want.
A ROM based on CARBON contains, of course, all that has already Carbon (except the changes made by the user is using as the base). In your case C-ROM is BASED on CARBON, which means the thing I explained above. NOW, I'm ONLY compiling an existing ROM, Carbon, which is manteined by a Team which already existed before C-Rom that was based on another ROM, not Carbon. Aways entered as a member in that team after compiling it from source and creating a thread in XDA and posting commits on them Github page (search it with Google, can't post link atm) which is a thing that ANY member registered (free) on GITHUB could do (obviously knowing what "he's" pulling as request and if it is accepted by CarbonDev). His Carbon thread wasn't updated for so long, and people begin to ask an updated version of this fantastic ROM, so I decided to continue his job, but taking care of it every week. SO, don't blame with me that Carbon is the same as C-ROM, because C-ROM is based on Carbon and not vice versa.
|
| Los siguientes 3 usuarios han agradecido a The_Wolf91 su comentario: | ||
|
#96
14/10/13, 16:23:19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por The_Wolf91
Let's clarify a few points. Mackay kernel was not chosen on advice, but simply because it seems to give the best performance and is updated more often than Semaphore kernel. Don't consider kernel a FEATURE (as I already stated), because IT'S NOT and you can flash the kernel you want.
A ROM based on CARBON contains, of course, all that has already Carbon (except the changes made by the user is using as the base). In your case C-ROM is BASED on CARBON, which means the thing I explained above. NOW, I'm ONLY compiling an existing ROM, Carbon, which is manteined by a Team which already existed before C-Rom that was based on another ROM, not Carbon. Aways entered as a member in that team after compiling it from source and creating a thread in XDA and posting commits on them Github page (search it with Google, can't post link atm) which is a thing that ANY member registered (free) on GITHUB could do (obviously knowing what "he's" pulling as request and if it is accepted by CarbonDev). His Carbon thread wasn't updated for so long, and people begin to ask an updated version of this fantastic ROM, so I decided to continue his job, but taking care of it every week. SO, don't blame with me that Carbon is the same as C-ROM, because C-ROM is based on Carbon and not vice versa.
__________________
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
#97
14/10/13, 17:36:20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por The_Wolf91
Let's clarify a few points. Mackay kernel was not chosen on advice, but simply because it seems to give the best performance and is updated more often than Semaphore kernel. Don't consider kernel a FEATURE (as I already stated), because IT'S NOT and you can flash the kernel you want.
A ROM based on CARBON contains, of course, all that has already Carbon (except the changes made by the user is using as the base). In your case C-ROM is BASED on CARBON, which means the thing I explained above. NOW, I'm ONLY compiling an existing ROM, Carbon, which is manteined by a Team which already existed before C-Rom that was based on another ROM, not Carbon. Aways entered as a member in that team after compiling it from source and creating a thread in XDA and posting commits on them Github page (search it with Google, can't post link atm) which is a thing that ANY member registered (free) on GITHUB could do (obviously knowing what "he's" pulling as request and if it is accepted by CarbonDev). His Carbon thread wasn't updated for so long, and people begin to ask an updated version of this fantastic ROM, so I decided to continue his job, but taking care of it every week. SO, don't blame with me that Carbon is the same as C-ROM, because C-ROM is based on Carbon and not vice versa.
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
#98
14/10/13, 17:57:48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por Aways
And I need to add my things mate: yes Carbon base of my rom maybe anyone want to ask me why same rom? It's not completely same Carbon some settings different but yea almost same, but I am waiting for full features than I will change something on my rom and + no one can say carbon and c-rom have same performance for me c-rom smooth than carbon please wait a bit and see...
__________________
|
|
#99
14/10/13, 18:19:59
|
||||
|
||||
|
Both of you are some machines! Thanks for your work and thanks to follow this spanish thread about your work
|
| Gracias de parte de: | ||
|
|
|
#100
14/10/13, 20:45:32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cita: Originalmente Escrito por mamoto
El wifi lo gestiona el kernel,por lo tanto,puede que te mejore cambiando el que trae que creo que es Mackay ,por otro.
Mod no se,pero puedes cambiar el Tema y te cambiara cosillas que puede que te gusten mas.Lo del ingles,puedes usar el google traductor y si no pregunta si te puede ayudar alguien.Saludos. Por cierto esta rom mejora dia a dia. Me podrias aconsejar un kernel... o alguien que haya tenido problemas similares a los mios y al cambiar el kernel le haya ido mejor el wifi. Respecto al screenshot de pantalla..me da un error y no deja capturar la imagen. No se ha podido gauardar la imagen. Puede que el almacenamiento este en uso Alguien sabria el porque de este error.
__________________
|
 |
Estás aquí
|
||||||
|
||||||
![Array
[xs_avatar]](https://avatar.htcmania.com/avatares/avatar603154_25.gif){kind=avatar}
![Array
[xs_avatar]](https://avatar.htcmania.com/avatares/avatar518420_8.gif){kind=avatar}
![Array
[xs_avatar]](https://avatar.htcmania.com/avatares/unknown.gif)
![Array
[xs_avatar]](https://avatar.htcmania.com/avatares/avatar213054_5.gif){kind=avatar}