[ REVIEW ] Hilo para ir poniendo las reviews

[Amaya84]

Review de Mobile-review (podeis usar el traductor de Google para pasarlo a inglés o español):

http://www.mobile-review.com/review/...xy-s4-fl.shtml

[giru]

Ir al link original: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4-review-910.php

[Amaya84]

Lo de que se pueda poner temporizador para el Wi.Fi y el Bluetooth me parece interesante.



En los SMS ahora salen las fotos de los contactos...

[giru]

Ir al link original: http://samsung.hdblog.it/2013/03/21/galaxy-s4-display-piu-luminoso-bianchi-migliori-e-tutti-i-benchmark-del-modello-snapdgragon-600

[oXUnknownXo]

Análisis de Phonearena:
Ir al link original: http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S4-Review_id3280

[giru]

Me sorprende que Phonearena le conceda una muy buena nota al S4 incluso mejor que al HTC visto como tiraban últimamente del lado de los taiwaneses. Aunque al final no se cortaron :
CONS
Mediocre call quality
Thin, plastic casing

Vistas las principales reviews creo que Samsung hizo un buen trabajo con el S4, quizás como único detalle negativo que YO le veo es sacar 2 versiones y la forma de como las van a distribuir. La versión Qualcomm rinde fantástica, pero el Exynos 5 Octa aporta esa dosis de exotismo y ganas de probar algo diferente a lo que plantean otras marcas. Ahora que cada uno se decida por comprar el terminal de la marca que quiera y nada más.

[titovicente]

Había leído todas menos la primera, tiene muy buena pinta, a leer !!!

[Amaya84]

 Cita: Originalmente Escrito por giru

Me sorprende que Phonearena le conceda una muy buena nota al S4 incluso mejor que al HTC visto como tiraban últimamente del lado de los taiwaneses. Aunque al final no se cortaron :
CONS
Mediocre call quality
Thin, plastic casing

Vistas las principales reviews creo que Samsung hizo un buen trabajo con el S4, quizás como único detalle negativo que YO le veo es sacar 2 versiones y la forma de como las van a distribuir. La versión Qualcomm rinde fantástica, pero el Exynos 5 Octa aporta esa dosis de exotismo y ganas de probar algo diferente a lo que plantean otras marcas. Ahora que cada uno se decida por comprar el terminal de la marca que quiera y nada más.

A mi lo que me parece raro es que en la review diga no esta tan mal la calidad de llamada (dentro de la media) y luego pongan abajo que mediocre

A ver si se ve pronto una review del Exynos con Power VR.

[oXUnknownXo]

Análisis de la cámara por Mobile-Review, a excepción del Nokia 808, la tachan como la mejor del mercado:

 Cita:

Impressions

I will start from a distance. I always use Instagram, which I have already more than a thousand pictures . The most common question that people ask - "what made these pictures." Most do not believe that so can shoot a camera phone, in my case, Galaxy S3. Many are trying to get me to clean water, and such fighters for justice appear weekly. If I had a hundred rubles for each question as you remove the photos, then just make a lot of boost to their monthly salary.
For me the choice of Galaxy S3 was not least dictated by the fact that with this phone, I have the freedom to photos - many settings (which does not have the iPhone, there is one option - to photograph), the guaranteed average quality and excellent quality with sufficient lighting. In fact, S3 is the standard for image quality, it is one of the most popular models with a quality camera (Note 2 can be regarded as equivalent). In the mass unconscious quality camera to count as the iPhone, though it is clearly not up to the level of Galaxy S3 (foresee indignant cries, but what to do, this is the reality).
In fact, for most phone users quality photographs is determined only by how it is displayed on the phone screen. And here in the Samsung always win, because the quality and the diagonal screen is much better and higher than the competition (this involves not only the number of dots per inch, but the screen size). First we need to talk about winning the iPhone, although given that most of the quality of the photos on the last completely satisfied, it does not matter.
For me, the transition from an 8-megapixel camera Galaxy S3 to S4 with its 13 megapixel camera was very easy and simple, no inconvenience, except that on a long menu endured exposure compensation, which is needed when shooting at night. Additional modes clearly targeted at young people, who would be happy to play the shot with two cameras, the creation of animated pictures and things like that. This de facto entertainment, additional content, which is useless to evaluate in terms of like / dislike. Not sure what mature consumers are able to make. For example, my kids, playing with a record of animation, very quickly found a use for it and said it was cool feature that will appeal to the majority of their class. And they began to inquire the opportunity to bring the phone to show you how it works. That is to say that the school is catchy, and these chips in the machine a lot, but some will hook and will talk about the phone. This kind of entertainment.
I am pleased that the search for additional features that are not always serious, Samsung did not forget about the quality of the main features - the camera did not shoot worse, she became better (color, resolution, detail). Once again Samsung could create a master product, which in this parameter sets the tone in the market - I hope no one will argue that the Android market from other manufacturers is not comparable cameras and they appear much later. In fact, we can say that the competition is between the iPhone and the Galaxy, while other manufacturers are just trying to break into this fight. While it is impossible to assess the quality HTC One (not the final hardware is still not), and Nokia Lumia 920 is such a niche device with limited additional functionality that did not seriously consider it worth (and proven many times that the picture quality is mediocre at the device, to another level is extended only nighttime, it is not necessary for most people.) We will try to do a full fotosravnenie different champions and phones with good cameras to see who wins the contest, although such a comparison will be crafty (units set by the camera, the majority looks at the totality of characteristics, and the failure of sales Nokia 808 - proof).


Personally for me, the camera on the phone is important, so the selection is always careful what to take and what to use. Informed choice Galaxy S3 on aggregate characteristics made possible by the camera, with the S4, apparently, will have the same story, unless Apple in the next model will not be able to do the impossible - but it is little hope for the calculation of the company - "point and shoot", and means that many camera modes just are not implemented, and the experience of Apple in this area just is not enough, unlike Samsung, which produces a large number of different cameras.


Total in one word - love. S4 camera in perfect and outperforms other phones, which proves that this comparison. Given that the product will be very widespread, we can expect that people will have more good quality photos that can only be welcomed.

Está en ruso, copiar enlace en el google translate:
Ir al link original: http://mobile-review.com/review/samsung-galaxy-s4-camera.shtml

[Amaya84]

Artículo oficial Samsung Tomorrow (como los anteriores usad traductor y trae varios videos):

http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/4176

[SpandauB]

¿Que os parece la funda que aparece al principio?, me gusta el detalle dejando ver el widget del tiempo y reloj...

[JacksSsS]

En serio? Reviews en chino y ruso? Me estáis vacilando? Y además traducicas con Google traslator??? Así alguno luego se inventa las cosas que se inventa jajaja

[titovicente]

 Cita: Originalmente Escrito por SpandauB

¿Que os parece la funda que aparece al principio?, me gusta el detalle dejando ver el widget del tiempo y reloj...

mira aqui sale mejor

A mi me gusta mucho la idea... pero 70$ vi que costaba. Pero yo soy de usar tapa trasera de TPU por que cuando se te cae no pasa nada... con estas no se lo que pasaria

[oXUnknownXo]

Comparativa de GSMArena entre el HTC one y el Galaxy SIV:
Ir al link original: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_vs_htc_one-review-913.php

[ras_excalibur]

No es un review como tal, pero aquí se muestra el S4 que se comercializara en México

[giru]

Review de hoy de un Galaxy S4 versión Exynos 5 Octa
Ir al link original: http://gagadget.com/cellphones/2013-03-27-obzor-samsung-galaxy-s4

[mavc90]

Aquí os pongo otra review

http://www.internetmovil.eu/5567-sam...s-y-novedades

[Amaya84]

Reviews ahora si, de GSMArena:

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_gala...review-914.php

Y Mobile Review:

http://www.mobile-review.com/review/...alaxy-s4.shtml

[oXUnknownXo]

Comparativa con el Xperia Z:
Ir al link original: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_vs_sony_xperia_z-review-915.php

Sobre la cámara:

 Cita:

In the Superior Auto mode the Sony Xperia Z produces photos with pleasing, albeit slightly oversaturated colors. The images shot in Normal Auto, appear more natural and lack that overprocessed look. Since most of the users will use the default Superior Auto (which usually does better anyway), we shot our samples with this mode. Either way, though, the resolved detail is hardly spectacular and noticeably lower compared to Galaxy S4's samples and the noise levels are only average. There's also noticable purple fringing and while the dynamic range is on par between the two, the Galaxy S4 has the upper hand in terms of contrast.

So even though the Sony Xperia Z produces decent shots overall, it doesn't even come close to the Galaxy S4 photos. Here go a few crops to illustrate our point.



The LED flash on the Samsung Galaxy S4 is a lot more powerful than the one used in the Sony Xperia Z and this is main reason for the disappointing indoor performance of Xperia Z when compared to the Galaxy S4.

And here come the 100% crops where you can clearly see the Galaxy S4 superiority.


Finally, the cloudy weather was no sweat for the Samsung Galaxy S4 - more than enough detail, good colors and contrast, while the Sony Xperia Z got the exposure wrong and produced a noisy sample with an only average amount of fine detail.

Check the crops to see for yourself.



Finally, we come to comparing the panorama shots from the two smartphones.
Keep in mind that the Galaxy S4 must be used in portrait mode to be able to shoot a full-res 360-degree panorama, otherwise you'll get a lower-res, poorly stitched picture. We are not quite sure what the reason behind this is and it might have something to do with the software still being finalized.
Anyway, the Samsung Galaxy S4 is capable of shooting a full-res 360-degree panorama, which results in photos of about 60MP resolution (roughly 20000x3000px). The picture quality is amazing and stitching is very good. Because the Xperia Z can't do 360-degree panos, we only covered the same viewing angle with the two.
The Sony Xperia Z also offers very-well stitched panorama samples with good contrast, but that's the only good we can say. The detail could have been better, the resolution is very low at about 5000x1080px, and the whole thing looks more like a video screenshot (which it probably is given the resolution) rather than a shot worthy of a flagship.



Samsung Galaxy S4 panorama

Sony Xperia Z panorama

[Amaya84]