Ver Mensaje Individual
  #36  
Viejo 25/10/09, 01:05:33
Array

[xs_avatar]
fozzy fozzy no está en línea
Colaborador/a
· Votos compra/venta: (8)
 
Fecha de registro: oct 2008
Localización: Valladolid
Mensajes: 16,075
Modelo de smartphone: Pixel 9
Tu operador: DigiMobil
SRazon por la que ha quitado el compcache y no recomienda el BFS;
cyanogen
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,499





Quote:
Originally Posted by acidwashg1
+1
what issues was BFS causing? what issues was compcache causing? 4.2 screams with a linux-swap but I'd like to test it out with BFS+compcache to see what the performance difference is...just hoping for some insider info from cyanogen =)


BFS exposes some subtle bugs in the hardware drivers, probably timing related. Random reboots, etc. Very difficult to debug. I want to continue working with BFS cause it rocks, but the issues it creates definitely aren't for a stable build.

Compcache and the Android lowmemory killer interact in funny ways. And the only reason I was including it by default was to help the home app stay in memory. And with the tweak i added for 4.2, this is a non issue
__________________

Dice que producen reinicios aleatorios, problemas con los drivers y retardos en las aplicaciones.
Responder Con Cita