[ximotomin]

Mirad que "robado" del post de la balck mix de Sergiofct . A mi me aclara bastantes cosas...

BENCHMARK:

Quadrant Standard (3rd run)

• Phenomenal 4.0: 4780
• SpeedMod K2-21: 4771
• N.E.A.K. v1.3.3: 4616
• Siyah v2.6.12: 4345
• Stock XILA2 kernel: 4259
• Stock XWLA4 kernel: 4076
• Stock XWKL1 kernel: 4036
• Stock XWKK5 kernel: 3899
• Stock XWKK2 kernel: 3852

Quadrant Standard 2.0 (3rd run)

• N.E.A.K. v1.4: 3860
• RedPill v1.3: 3282

NenaMark2 (best of 3 runs)

• Stock XILA2 kernel: 54,3
• N.E.A.K. v1.4: 54,2
• N.E.A.K. v1.3.3: 54,2
• Stock XWLA4 kernel: 54,2
• Siyah v2.6.12: 54,1
• SpeedMod K2-21: 53,5
• RedPill v1.3: 52,7
• Stock XWKK5 kernel: 47,8
• Stock XWKK2 kernel: 47,6
• Phenomenal 4.0: 44,4
• Stock XWKL1 kernel: 38,1

Vellamo (best of 2 runs)

• Stock XILA2 kernel: 1225
• SpeedMod K2-21: 1224
• Siyah v2.6.12: 1221
• N.E.A.K. v1.4: 1219
• Stock XWLA4 kernel: 1216
• Phenomenal 4.0: 1214
• N.E.A.K. v1.3.3: 1213
• Stock XWKL1 kernel: 1173
• RedPill v1.3: 1172
• Stock XWKK5 kernel: 1160
• Stock XWKK2 kernel: 1080

Linpack (best of 10 runs): Single / Multi thread

• Phenomenal 4.0: 57.342 / 102.346
• SpeedMod K2-21: 57.224 / 98.062
• Siyah v2.6.12: 57.816 / 95.725
• N.E.A.K. v1.3.3: 57.499 / 95.454
• N.E.A.K. v1.4: 57.302 / 95.077
• Stock XWLA4 kernel: 57.816 / 93.548
• Stock XILA2 kernel: 57.302 / 91.667
• RedPill v1.3: 57.499 / 80.663

CF-Bench (best of 2 runs): Native / Java / Overall score

• N.E.A.K. v1.3.3: 11530 / 3623 / 6785
• Stock XWLA4 kernel: 11396 / 3539 / 6681
• Phenomenal 4.0: 11522 / 3409 / 6654
• N.E.A.K. v1.4: 11400 / 3374 / 6584
• SpeedMod K2-21: 11428 / 3355 / 6584
• Siyah v2.6.12: 11413 / 3313 / 6553
• RedPill v1.3: 11271 / 3229 / 6445
• Stock XILA2 kernel: 11285 / 3187 / 6426

AnTuTu (1st run)

• N.E.A.K. v1.4: 6177
• N.E.A.K. v1.3.3: 6149
• Stock XILA2 kernel: 6110
• Siyah v2.6.12: 6072
• Stock XWLA4 kernel: 6009
• SpeedMod K2-21: 4986
• Phenomenal 4.0: 4966
• RedPill v1.3: 4832

ESTADÍSTICAS DE BATERÍA:

Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)

• RedPill v1.3 (sio/conservative): Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 4,8%, Deep sleep: 93%
• Phenomenal 4.0 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
• SpeedMod K2-21: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 93%
• XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
• RedPill v1.3: Battery loss of 1,00% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 92%
• N.E.A.K. v1.4: Battery loss of 1,02% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 92%
• XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
• XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
• N.E.A.K. v1.3.3: Battery loss of 1,28% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
• XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
• Siyah v2.6.12: Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Awake: 9,6%, Deep sleep: 89%

Mixed (day and night) usage (*)

• RedPill v1.3(sio/conservative): Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,8%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
• SpeedMod K2-21: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,7%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
• RedPill v1.3: Battery loss of 2,02% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,81%
• Phenomenal 4.0 Extreme: Battery loss of 2,05% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,6%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,85%
• XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
• N.E.A.K. v1.4: Battery loss of 2,26% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 11,4% => loss*(1-screen): 2,00%
• XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
• XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
• XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
• Siyah v2.6.12: Battery loss of 2,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 23,3%, Deep sleep: 76%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 2,63%
• N.E.A.K. v1.3.3: Battery loss of 3,05% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 24,3%, Deep sleep: 75%, Screen: 11,4% => loss*(1-screen): 2,70%

(*)Con el fin de obtener un valor, lo que permite comparar los resultados con pantalla diferente en los tiempos de mezcla de las pruebas de uso de la batería, he tratado de "normalizar" la pérdida de la batería por hora, con la siguiente fórmula:
pérdida * (1-pantalla): Pérdida de la batería en% (por hora) * (100% - pantalla en el tiempo en%)
Así, sería la pérdida de la batería en% (por hora) para la pantalla de tiempo.
Así es como un núcleo con la pérdida misma batería por hora, obtendrá un mejor precio / menor, si tiene más pantalla en el tiempo. (Y al revés.)