Tarde o temprano, en todos los subforos de los distintos terminales, aparece este interesante hilo. Aunque por ahora no podemos dar nuestras experiencias personales, sí podemos ir dejando por aquí los test que vayan apareciendo en las reviews que van apareciendo.
Yo me he encontrado con esta:
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/peripherals/1...ry-results-and
Viene a decir que mejora la del G3, en cambio, parece que drena más la batería que el S6, aunque menos que el M9. No se si es para preocuparse, ya que a la batería del S6 no la están poniendo bien precisamente ...
"Elsewhere, battery life is an improvement on last year’s G3, both in terms of its capacity and according to the results from our tests. Streaming a 720p video in flight mode with the screen set to a brightness of 120cd/m2 drained it at 6.3% per hour while audio streaming over 4G drained it at 3.6%.
That can’t quite match the Samsung Galaxy S6’s figures of 5.5% and 3%, but it's better than the MTC One M9 (9.7% and 2.6%), and with a user-replaceable battery, it's more flexible than both.
LG credits the phone’s improved efficiency to a number of changes, not least a more efficient screen. The G4 uses what LG calls “N-type liquid crystals”, which it says allows the light from the screen’s backlight through the structure of the liquid crystal more easily.
Reading between the lines, the benefit here isn’t intended to be extra brightness - the LG G4’s top brightness of 476cd/m2 is far from most eye-searing we’ve measured - rather the reduction the amount of power needed to power the display to that sort of brightness in the first place."